COVID-19_HRCT

</link>

Idiot’s Guide to Covid-19 HRCT reporting.

At the time of writing the literature on SARS-Cov-2 infection is dominated by small descriptive studies mostly coming out of Wuhan in China. There are significant differences in age (average in many papers = 40 to 50yrs), background morbidity, medical practice and culture which will alter how this disease will present, be interpreted and will probably alter what the findings on radiology are. So, don’t expect our experience over the next few months to be the same.

Table of Contents

Clinical Features

Symptoms and Signs

Timescales

Changes on HRCT are described soon after onset, so we may expect to see abnormalities on most of the referral but only 55% of patients had abnormalities on HRCT from day 0-2 of infection.


Presentation: CXR features

These will be the first investigation and there is NO direct to HRCT!

The role is twofold:

  1. Identify the other causes of acute SoB.
    • Lobar, or at least unilateral consolidation and other features of infection . Covid-19 is rarely simultaneously obvious AND unilateral.
    • Pneumothorax. Should be obvious.
    • Pulmonary oedema. Pleural effusions are unusual in Covid-19 infection and rare at presentation as are marked interstitial changes.
  2. Positively identify the classical features of Covid-19 infection.
    • Patchy, bilateral airspace changes
    • Mostly subtle as more ground glass than consolidation.

    Combined with a decent history and other predictive elements ( Lymphopenia and / or Fever ) this has an adequate post-test probability to move straight into isolation without the need for a CT .
    This leaves a large group of patients with normal CXRs and good histories or patients with reasonable or good histories and some, but not specific CXR findings. For instance infective exacerbation of COPD. These patients will need an HRCT.

Faint patchy airspace opacities at presentation

CXR in patient presenting with Covid-19 infection - note the patchy, ill-defined, mostly peripheral regions of increased attenuation worse on the right than the left.

Range of changes on plain film Wong et al Rad 2020

CXRs demonstrating changes seen at presentation:
A= (patchy) consolidation 59%
B= pleural effusion 3%
C= perihilar distribution 12%
D= peripheral distribution 51%.


Presentation: HRCT

Classical Features.

  1. Ground-glass opacities :
    • Small and patchy > Large and Solitary
    • Basal > Apical and Posterior > Anterior.
    • Consolidation - nearly always in combination with the ground-glass opacities, rarely on its own.
  2. Err that is about it in terms of ‘classical features’ . Without ground-glass / mixed opacities it is unlikely to be Covid-19 and of course there are multiple virus and other pathogens and insults that can cause this so it is non-specific.

Classical CT at presentation

Typical CT at presentation with moderate size airspace opacities, which are bilateral, basal and mostly peripheral.

Then there are NOT-CLASSICAL APPEARANCES or occasional features often seen further into the course of the illness.

  1. Reticulation in association with the nodules
  2. Round opacities > linear opacities
  3. Vascular prominence.
  4. Crazy-paving / Perilobular changes.
  5. Reverse Halo / Atoll sign - though this is rare.

Then there are the NOT signs may not be related to COVID-19 and may push the differential toward something else.

  1. Cavitation
  2. Pleural effusion
  3. Thoracic lymphadenopathy
  4. Bronchial wall thickening is seen in a minority but mostly late and might be chronic.
  5. Widespread fibrosis.

NB
Background changes ( emphysema, fibrosis etc ) are common and might predict worse prognosis.
The literature on the ‘occasional’ findings is heterogeneous.
e.g. ‘reticulation’ - some papers say 0% at presentation, others 40 to 80%.

Subtle change at presentation

CT at presentation demonstrating subtle change which progressed on subsequent CTs - if asymptomatic or mild and / or early in disease then the changes can be minimal.

Obvious change at presentation

CT at presentation demonstrating more established change but slightly atypical change. There is certainly reticulation and one could mention perilobular or reversed halo. Subsequent CTs demonstrated more foci of ground glass opacity.


Change over time.

Non-fatal progression and resolution of severe infection

Phase Days Findings
Early 0-4 None ( esp 0-2 days)
Low volume, subpleural, lower lobe GGOs.
Unilateral or bilateral
Progressive 5-8 Rapid increase in size and number to bilateral multilobed with diffuse GGO.
Consolidation and crazy-paving described.
Peak 9-13 No new lesions.
Increase in attenuation in lesions now with dense consolidation
Crazy-paving and parenchymal bands more common.
Absorption 14-28 Gradual resorption of consolidation.
Appears to be more GGO as the consolidation reduces.
No crazy paving.

90% + of scans carried out at Day 24-28 will be abnormal - mostly still some airspace change.

CT demonstrating a moderate pneumonia with resolution, Pan et al Radiol 2020 in press

CT series of a 47yo female demonstrating the changes and resolution of a covid-19 infection.
A= 3 days post onset, B = 7 days post onset, C = 11 days post onset with signs of improvement which is early, D= 20 days

CT pattern of resolution over time Wang et al Radiol in press

CT series of a 35yo female with Covid-19 pneumonia.
A= Day 0, B= Day 5, C= Day 11, D= Day 15 post onset.

Fatal and very severe infection


Pathway

we are following the BSTI pathway.

BSTI Pathway v1


Reports

as per the BSTI/BSUH reporting proforma:

CXR (feel free to cut and paste)

Classification Findings REPORT MUST SAY
Normal The airspaces are clear. Normal
COVID-19 not excluded. Correlate with RT-PCR and if there is a strong clinical
suspicion of COVID-19 ( eg sats <94% or NEWS >=3 ) then consider HRCT.
Other Diagnosis Radiological findings in keeping with another diagnosis that fits the presentation.
(PTx/Lobar pneumonia/pleural effusion/pulmonary oedema/etc)
Non-COVID-19
Imaging appearances are in keeping with a non-COVID-19 diagnosis.
Indeterminate Is not normal, classical COVID nor another classical diagnosis. Indeterminate for COVID-19
Does not fit with Classic or Non-Covid-19. Please assess the patient with all available data.
Classical or Probable
COVID-19
Multiple airspace opacities which are mostly lower lobe and/or peripheral and bilateral. Classic/Probable COVID-19. Please isolate and treat as appropriate

HRCT

Section Findings REPORT WILL/MUST SAY
Pre-existing
lung findings
None
Emphysema
Fibrosis
None
Emphysema: none/mild/moderate/severe
Fibrosis: none/mild/moderate/severe
Findings    
  Normal
Normal HRCT
No acute change on background abnormality
No acute changes consistent with COVID-19 infection
  Classic/Probable COVID-19
Dominant pattern of ground-glass opacities +/- consolidation.
Often bilateral, posterior and basal.
+/- crazy-paving/reverse halo/perilobular change
eg “There are several peripheral ground-glass opacities
which are mostly in the posterobasal parts of both
lungs with foci of consolidation and crazy-paving noted”
  Indeterminate for COVID-19
Does not fit classic COVID-19 pattern or non-COVID-19 pattern or clinical context.
Include non-peripheral GGO/ marked unilateral change etc.
eg “There is a focus of ground glass opacity centrally on the left”
  Non-COVID-19
Changes not associated with COVID-19 but sugestive of other differentials
Include lobar pneumonia/cavitation/tree-in-bud/centrilobular nodules/lymphadenopathy etc
eg “There are multiple regions of centrilobular nodules and
tree-in-bud change more in keeping with xxx and these are
not changes described with COVID-19 infection”
Disease
Distribution
Describe the predominant distribution Upper / Middle / Lower / Random
Central 2/3rds / Peripheral 1/3rd
Bronchocentric ( y / n )
Other findings Heart / mediastinum / pleura / chest wall etc eg “No other significant abnormality seen”
“Note is made of cardiomegaly / pleural effusion” etc
CONCLUSION:    
  Normal Normal
Correlate with rt-PCR as CT can be normal early in infecton
  Classic/Probable COVID-19 Diagnosis
Assess CT severity score
Mild = Pure GGO, <=3 focal abnormalities and ALL <= 3cm
Mod/Severe = Consolidation, Pure GGO if > 3 and any >3cm, Architectural distortion
Classic/Probable COVID-19 Diagnosis
CT severity score = Mild or Moderate/Severe.
  Indeterminate COVID-19 diagnosis Indeterminate COVID-19 diagnosis
Clinical review with all the data is advised
  Non-COVID-19 diagnosis Non-COVID-19 diagnosis
Correlate with rt-PCR as CT can be normal in early infection

Not such important stuff.

Reticulation

Vascular Enlargement

hmm, yeah clearly that vessel is larger than I expect it to be 🤔

Crazy Paving

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Diffuse Alveolar Damage

Organising Pneumonia

Perilobular

Reversed Halo and Atolls

Bandlike changes & Dependent changes.


Covid-19 resources

General

Image Galleries

Colleges / Associations / Journals


HRCT appearances of other things

UIP / CFA

uip/cfa

usual interstital pneumonia is the histological findings in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis.

Pulmonary oedema

fluidoverload

pleural effusions and nice demonstration of interlobular septal thickening is someone with gross fluid overload.


Bibliography & References

all the above and all the images are derived from the following sources sorry for not attributing properly yet.

1.Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH-T, et al. Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in COVID-19 Positive Patients. Radiology 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201160.
  
2.Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;0(0):null. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2005073.
  
3.COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus) n.d. https://www.dynamed.com/condition/covid-19-novel-coronavirus (accessed March 29, 2020).
  
4.Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study- ClinicalKey n.d. https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/journal/1-s2.0-S0140673620305663 (accessed March 29, 2020).
  
5.Daniel Kaul MD. Risk Factors for ARDS and Progression to Death Among COVID-19 Patients. NEJM Journal Watch 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm-jw.NA51132.
  
6.Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2020;20(4):425–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4.
  
7.COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression- ClinicalKey n.d. https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/journal/1-s2.0-S0140673620306280 (accessed March 29, 2020).
  
8.Zhao W, Zhong Z, Xie X, Yu Q, Liu J. Relation Between Chest CT Findings and Clinical Conditions of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Multicenter Study. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22976.
  
9.Li Y, Xia L. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Role of Chest CT in Diagnosis and Management. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22954.
  
10.Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review of Imaging Findings in 919 Patients. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23034.
  
11.Cheng Z, Lu Y, Cao Q, et al. Clinical Features and Chest CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Single-Center Study in Shanghai, China. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22959.
  
12.Han R, Huang L, Jiang H, Dong J, Peng H, Zhang D. Early Clinical and CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22961.
  
13.Liu D, Li L, Wu X, et al. Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Women With Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Preliminary Analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23072.
  
14.Guan W, Liu J, Yu C. CT Findings of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Severe Pneumonia. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020:W1–2. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23035.
  
15.Ng M-Y, Lee EY, Yang J, et al. Imaging Profile of the COVID-19 Infection: Radiologic Findings and Literature Review. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020;2(1):e200034. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200034.
  
16.Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al. Time Course of Lung Changes On Chest CT During Recovery From 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Radiology 2020:200370. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200370.
  
17.Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology 2020:200642. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642.
  
18.Bai HX, Hsieh B, Xiong Z, et al. Performance of radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 from viral pneumonia on chest CT. Radiology 2020:200823. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200823.
  
19.Inui S, Fujikawa A, Jitsu M, et al. Chest CT Findings in Cases from the Cruise Ship “Diamond Princess” with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020;2(2):e200110. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200110.
  
20.Li L, Qin L, Xu Z, et al. Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes COVID-19 from Community Acquired Pneumonia on Chest CT. Radiology 2020:200905. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200905.
  
21.Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH-T, et al. Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in COVID-19 Positive Patients. Radiology 2020:201160. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201160.
  
22.Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, et al. Temporal Changes of CT Findings in 90 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study. Radiology 2020:200843. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200843.
  
23.Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection. Radiology 2020:200463. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200463.
  
24.Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging. Radiology 2008;246(3):697–722. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070712.
  
25.2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) n.d. https://pubs.rsna.org/2019-nCoV (accessed March 25, 2020).
  
26.Kanne JP, Little BP, Chung JH, Elicker BM, Ketai LH. Essentials for Radiologists on COVID-19: An Update—Radiology Scientific Expert Panel. Radiology 2020:200527. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200527.
  
27.Helpful documents to plan COVID response | The Royal College of Radiologists n.d. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/network/helpful-documents-plan-covid-response (accessed March 25, 2020).

Other Images